关于“HTTP Load Balancer”的评价

Aakanksha P. · 评论over 3 years之前

Aprajita T. · 评论over 3 years之前

Very satisfied. The step at the end might require a egress firewall rule to allow traffic to the public load balancer IP.

Prateek S. · 评论over 3 years之前

alexander de jesus p. · 评论over 3 years之前

Alexander B. · 评论over 3 years之前

CLAUDIA MILENA R. · 评论over 3 years之前

Karen F. · 评论over 3 years之前

Yudy Patricia G. · 评论over 3 years之前

Andrés Felipe M. · 评论over 3 years之前

Isaac A. · 评论over 3 years之前

Nishith S. · 评论over 3 years之前

Srinivas S. · 评论almost 4 years之前

Boominathan S. · 评论almost 4 years之前

Peeya I. · 评论almost 4 years之前

hardest lab yet, took 5 tries and half my weekend It should not take that long and the scoring did now work and there is no way to have lab check if it was done right

Amil G. · 评论almost 4 years之前

NARENDRA N. · 评论almost 4 years之前

Amil G. · 评论almost 4 years之前

NARENDRA N. · 评论almost 4 years之前

It requires update of the console interface and fields.

Razvan S. · 评论almost 4 years之前

Ryk L. · 评论almost 4 years之前

RajagopalIyengar i. · 评论almost 4 years之前

Not enough time!!!!!

Chuck H. · 评论almost 4 years之前

i got to the end of the lab THREE TIMES but was not able to deploy the 250 user attack from the Seige SSH instance - THREE TIMES... Instructions need to be updated. The instructions for the "Seige" attack on the Load Balancer has terrible instructions. It asks to pull up the IP Address - but it references a different GCP console UI than the current GCP console UI.. The instructions for the "Load Balancer" did not match the GCP UI console and was very time-consuming to figure it out . Please have someone Quality Check this Lab. It NEEDS to be updated with CLEARER instructions. Thank you.

Gloria D. · 评论almost 4 years之前

HJ L. · 评论almost 4 years之前